10 Lines on Second Battle Of Panipat: The second battle of Panipat is a famous battle that was fought between a Hindu emperor of India and the forces of Akbar. The battle holds strategic importance in the history of India and explains how the Dynamics of the country would have changed if the results of the battle were different at that point in time.
The battle was fought on 5th November 1556 and Hem Chandra Vikramaditya conquered the states of Delhi and Agra and defeated Mughals which was led by Tardi Beg Khan.
You can read more 10 Lines about articles, events, people, sports, technology many more.
Set 1 – 10 Lines on Second Battle Of Panipat for Kids
Set 1 is helpful for students of Classes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
- The second battle of Panipat was fought between Hindu Emperor Hemu Chandra Vikramaditya and Akbar
- The second battle of Panipat was fought in the year 1556 on the 5th of November
- The Mughal Empire lost the cities of Delhi and Agra to the Hindu forces
- There are many battles that are fought in Panipat because of its strategic importance to the military and political class
- All the battles at Panipat involved the murder of millions of soldiers across both sides
- The Panipat area consisted of Yamuna and Ganga and had economic importance
- Second battle of Panipat ends the Afghan rule in India
- The battle also Re-established Mughal rule in India and made Akbar the ruler of Indi
- Panipat has seen three important battles that have changed the Dynamics of the country
- The second battle of Panipat was won by the Mughal generals Khan Zaman and Bairam Khan.
Set 2 – 10 Lines on Second Battle Of Panipat for School Students
Set 2 is helpful for students of Classes 6, 7 and 8.
- The second battle of Panipat was fought between the Hindu Emperor Chandra Vikramaditya and the Mughal Emperor Akbar
- The battle was won by the Akbar regime and this helped the Mughal emperor to re-establish their power in India
- The second battle of Panipat represents more of a Hindu versus Muslim war in the country
- As Hem Chandra Vikramaditya started ruling many places in North India, it threatened Akbar and his rule in the country
- After nearly 350 years, the first Hindu ruler was established in the state of Delhi by Hemu Chandra Vikramaditya
- The first battle of Panipat was fought between Babar and Ibrahim Lodhi
- After the defeat of Mughals by Hemu, Akbar and his military strategist by Bairam Khan decided to wage war against Delhi
- The second battle of Panipat was fought between Hemu who led his own army and Akbar who did not participate in the war but sat few kilometres away from the war zone
- After the war ended, Tthe Hindu king Hemu was captured by Mughals and brought to Akbar in Panipat
- The significance of this battle is that it helped Mughals re-established their role in the country. Had Hemu Vikramaditya won the battle of Panipat, the history of India today would have been very different.
Set 3 – 10 Lines on Second Battle Of Panipat for Higher Class Students
Set 3 is helpful for students of Classes 9, 10, 11, 12 and Competitive Exams.
- In total, three strategic battles were fought in Panipat over many years
- The second battle of Panipat holds strategic importance because it established the Mughal rule in India which continued for many years henceforth
- The second battle of Panipat was the battle between the Hindu and Muslim regiment which was led by Hemchandra Vikramaditya and Akbar respectively
- Three battles in the year 1526, 1556, and 1761 were fought in Panipat which is around 80 kilometers north of Delhi
- More than 3000 Mughal soldiers were killed during the second battle of Panipat
- When second battle of Panipat was fought, Akbar was just 13 years old and hence the war was led by General Bairam Kahan
- During the second battle of Panipat, Hemu was the favourite to win but since he was killed early in the war, it demolished the morale of his soldiers and hence Mughals could easily break into the Hindu Army
- Panipat was the favourite ground for many rulers to fight wars because of its strategic, political and economic importance in the country
- If the battle of Panipat was won by the Hindu ruler Hemu, then Mughal rule would have completely ended in the country and probably the entry of British could have been stopped
- Had the result of the second battle of Panipat been different, then the third battle of Panipat would have never been fought.
FAQ’s on 10 Lines on Second Battle Of Panipat
Why did the second battle of Panipat take place?
The second battle of Panipat took place because the Mughals felt threatened by the Hindu rule and wanted to re-establish their Empire in India
Who won the second battle of Panipat?
The 13-year-old Akbar, a young Mughal ruler won the second battle of Panipat after defeating Hemu Chandra Vikramaditya
What is the significance of the second battle of Panipat?
After nearly 350 years of Mughal rule, a Hindu rule was established by Samrat Hemyu Chandra Vikramaditya, but it was very short-lived since he was defeated by Mughals again after few years in the second battle of Panipat, thus ending the Hindu rule in India
What would happen if Hindus had won the second battle of Panipat?
If Hindus had won the second battle of Panipat, then Mughals would have left India forever and India would have had Hindu rule for centuries to come